Designing with Medium: Exploring the Agency of Representational Media in Architectural Design
Downloads
This study attempts to elucidate the relative impact of the designated representational medium on architectural design knowledge during design activity by focusing on the relation between designers' cognitive processes and revealed design information corresponding to different representational media during the design process.
The assertion here is that designing, specifically the act of representation, occurs absolutely with the existence of a medium and that representational media have agency, which affects the information content of the designers during design activity. Designing is defined as a process of construction of representations, where the act of representing facilitates a reflective dialogue between the designer and the object of representation. The framework of the study is aimed at revealing the agency of representational media through a community of practice within the shared sociocultural, and environmental contexts. The interaction between the designer and the media of representation has been structured upon the theoretical model -Activity Theory-, which offers a framework for analyzing human actions oriented toward specific purposes through instruments within particular conditions.
Within the framework of the article, two workshop sessions and semi-structured interviews related to the sessions were conducted. The data derived from the interviews are examined using the reflexive thematic analysis method; information content related to various representational media within the common sociocultural and environmental context are revealed.
Akin, Ömer, and Chengtah Lin. 1995. "Design Protocol Data and Novel Design Decisions." Design Studies 16: 211–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(94)00010-B.
Alexander, Christopher. 1964. Notes on the Synthesis of Form. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Badke-Schaub, Petra, and Özgür Eris. 2014. "A Theoretical Approach to Intuition in Design: Does Design Methodology Need to Account for Unconscious Processes?" In An Anthology of Theories and Models of Design, edited by Amaresh Chakrabarti and Lucienne T. M. Blessing, 353–370. London: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6338-1_17.
Braun, Virginia, and Victoria Clarke. 2006. "Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology." Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
Braun, Virginia, and Victoria Clarke. 2012. Thematic Analysis. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/13620-004.
Braun, Virginia, and Victoria Clarke. 2022. "Conceptual and Design Thinking for Thematic Analysis." Qualitative Psychology 9 (1): 3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/qup0000196.Cash, Philip J. 2018. "Developing Theory–Driven Design Research." Design Studies 56: 84–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2018.03.002.
Cash, Philip J., and Anja Maier. 2016. "Prototyping with Your Hands: The Many Roles of Gesture in the Communication of Design Concepts." Journal of Engineering Design 27 (1–3): 118–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2015.1126702.
Cash, Philip J., and Melanie Kreye. 2017. "Uncertainty Driven Action (UDA) Model: A Foundation for Unifying Perspectives on Design Activity." Design Science 3. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2017.28.
Chafi, Maral B. 2014. "Roles of Externalisation Activities in the Design Process." Swedish Design Research Journal 11: 34–46. https://doi.org/10.3384/svid.2000–964X.14134.
Crawford, Kate, and Hassan M. Hasan. 2006. " Demonstrations of the Activity Theory Framework for Research in Information Systems. Australasian Journal of Information Systems,” 13(2). https://doi.org/10.3127/ajis.v13i2.40.
Cross, Nigel. 2001. "Design Cognition: Results from Protocol and Other Empirical Studies of Design Activity." In Design Knowing and Learning: Cognition in Design Education, 79–103. Elsevier Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978–008043868–9/50005–X.
Cross, Nigel. 2006. Designerly Ways of Knowing. London: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/1–84628-301-9.
Dalsgaard, Peter. 2017. "Instruments of Inquiry: Understanding the Nature and Role of Tools in Design." International Journal of Design 11 (1): 21-33.
Do, Ellen Yi-Luen, Mark D. Gross, Bruce Neiman, and Craig Zimring. 2000. "Intentions in and Relations Among Design Drawings." Design Studies 21 (5): 483–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142694X(00)00020-X.
Do, Ellen Yi-Luen. 1995. "What’s in a diagram that a computer should understand.” CAAD Futures. 1995. 469-482.
Do, Ellen Yi-Luen. 1997. "Computability of Design Diagrams." In CAAD Futures 1997, 171–176. Dordrecht: Springer.
Do, Ellen Yi-Luen. 1998. “The right tool at the right time: Investigation of freehand drawing as an interface to knowledge-based design tools.” Georgia Institute of Technology.
Dorst, Kees, and Nigel Cross. 2001. "Creativity in the Design Process: Co-Evolution of Problem–Solution." Design Studies 22 (5): 425–37.
Engeström, Yrjö. 1987. Learning by Expanding: An Activity-Theoretical Approach to Developmental Research. Cambridge University Press.
Engeström, Yrjö. 2015. Learning by Expanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gero, John S., and Jelena Milovanovic. 2020. "A Framework for Studying Design Thinking Through Measuring Designers’ Minds, Bodies and Brains." Design Science 6 3-15.https://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2020.15.
Gibson, James J. 2014. "The Theory of Affordances. (1979)”. In The people, place, and space reader. Routledge: 56-60.
Goel, Vinod, and Peter Pirolli. 1992. "The Structure of Design Problem Spaces." Cognitive Science 16 (3): 395–429.
Goel, Vinod. 1995. Sketches of Thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6270.001.0001.
Goldschmidt, Gabriela. 1991. "The Dialectics of Sketching." Creativity Research Journal 4 (2): 123–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419109534381.
Goldschmidt, Gabriela. 1994. "On Visual Design Thinking: The Vis Kids of Architecture." Design Studies 15 (2): 158–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(94)90022-1.
Goldschmidt, Gabriela. 2007. "To See Eye to Eye: The Role of Visual Representations in Building Shared Mental Models in Design Teams." CoDesign 3 (1): 43–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880601170826.
Havnes, Anton. 2013. Assessment in higher education: A CHAT perspective. Pedagogy in higher education: A cultural historical approach, Cambridge University Press: 89-104.Hay, Laura, Philip Cash, and Seda McKilligan. 2020. "The Future of Design Cognition Analysis." Design Science 6: E20. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2020.20.
Herbert, Daniel M. 1988. “Study Drawings in Architectural Design: Their Properties as a Graphic Medium.” Journal of Architectural Education 41 (2): 26–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10464883.1988.10758473.
Hewitt, Mark. 1985. “Representational Forms and Modes of Conception: An Approach to the History of Architectural Drawing.” Journal of Architectural Education 39 (2): 2–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10464883.1985.10758387.
Johnson, Scott. 1998. “What’s in a Representation, Why Do We Care, and What Does It Mean? Examining Evidence from Psychology.” Automation in Construction 8 (1): 15–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0926–5805(98)00062–4.
Kannengiesser, Udo, and John S. Gero. 2019. “Design Thinking, Fast and Slow: A Framework for Kahneman’s Dual-System Theory in Design.” Design Science 5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2019.9.
Kaptelinin, Victor, and Bonnie A. Nardi. 2007. Acting with Technology: Activity Theory and Interaction Design. First Monday, 12(4).https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v12i4.1772.
Kavakli, Manolya, and John S. Gero. 2001. “Sketching as Mental Imagery Processing.” Design Studies 22 (4): 347–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(01)00002-3.
Lave, Jean, and Etienne Wenger. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press, 1991.
Lawson, Bryan. 2006. How Designers Think: The Design Process Demystified. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780080454979.
Leontiev, Aleksei N. 1974. “The Problem of Activity in Psychology.” Soviet Psychology 13 (2): 4–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.2753/RPO1061-040513024. .
Mao, Xiaoyang, Omar Galil, Quentcey Parrish, and Chiradeep Sen. 2020. “Evidence of Cognitive Chunking in Freehand Sketching during Design Ideation.” Design Studies 67: 1–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2019.11.009.
Milovanovic, Julie. 2019. Exploration of Architectural Design Studio Pedagogy: The Effect of Representational Ecosystems on Design Critiques. PhD diss., École Nationale Supérieure d’Architecture de Nantes, Loire Bretagne University.
Nelson, Harold G., and Erik Stolterman. 2014. The Design Way: Intentional Change in an Unpredictable World. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. http://dx.doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9188.001.0001.
Simon, Herbert. A., & Newell, Allen. 1971. Human problem solving: The state of the theory in 1970. American Psychologist, 26(2), 145–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0030806.
Oxman, Rivka. 1997. “Design by ReRepresentation: A Model of Visual Reasoning in Design.” Design Studies 18 (4): 329–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(97)00005-7.
Scaife, Mike, and Yvonne Rogers. 1996. “External Cognition: How Do Graphical Representations Work?” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 45 (2): 185–213. https://dx.doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.1996.0048.
Schön, Donald A. 2017. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315237473.
Schön, Donald A., and Glenn Wiggins. 1992. “Kinds of Seeing and Their Functions in Designing.” Design Studies 13 (2): 135–56. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0142–694X(92)90268–F.
Simon, Herbert A., and Mark Barenfeld. 1969. “Information-Processing Analysis of Perceptual Processes in Problem Solving.” Psychological Review 76, no.5 (September): 473–83. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0028159.
Stolterman, Erik. 2008. “The Nature of Design Practice and Implications for Interaction Design Research.” International Journal of Design 2, no (1).
Suwa, Masaki, and Barbara Tversky. 1997. “What Do Architects and Students Perceive in Their Design Sketches? A Protocol Analysis.” Design Studies 18 (4): 385–403. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0142-694X(97)00008-2.
Tahsiri, Mohammad, Jonathan Hale, and Chris Niblock. 2017. “Knowledge Distribution and the Effect of Design Tools on the Design Process.” In Design Computing and Cognition'16, edited by John S. Gero, 437–55. Cham: Springer.
Tversky, Barbara. 2002. “What Do Sketches Say About Thinking?” In 2002 AAAI Spring Symposium, Sketch Understanding Workshop, Stanford University, AAAI Technical Report SS–02-08, 148–51.
Tversky, Barbara. 2009. “Spatial Cognition: Embodied and Situated.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition, edited by Philip Robbins and Murat Aydede, 201–16. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816826.012.
Tversky, Barbara. 2014. “Visualizing Thought.” In Handbook of Human Centric Visualization, edited by Weidong Huang, 3–40. New York: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7485-2_1.
Ullman, David G., Stephen Wood, and David Craig. 1990. “The Importance of Drawing in the Mechanical Design Process.” Computers & Graphics 14 (2): 263–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0097-8493(90)90037-X.
Van Sommers, Peter. 1984. Drawing and Cognition: Descriptive and Experimental Studies of Graphic Production Processes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511897672.
Visser, Willemien, and Mary Lou Maher. 2011. “The Role of Gesture in Designing.” AI EDAM 25 (3): 213–20. https://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0890060411000047.
Visser, Willemien. 2006. “Designing as Construction of Representations: A Dynamic Viewpoint in Cognitive Design Research.” Human-Computer Interaction 21 (1): 103–52. https://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327051hci2101_4.
Visser, Willemien. 2006. The Cognitive Artifacts of Designing. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. https://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781482269529.
Visser, Willemien. 2010. “Visser: Design as Construction of Representations.” Collection, Art + Design & Psychology (2): 29–43.
Vygotsky, Lev S., and Michael Cole. 1978. Mind in Society: Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. https://dx.doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4.
Wenger, Etienne. 1998. "Communities of practice: Learning as a social system." Systems thinker vol. 9 no.5: 2-3.
Wertsch, James V., Harry Daniels, and Michael Cole, eds. 2007. The Cambridge Companion to Vygotsky. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521831040.
Zhang, Jiajie, and Vimla L. Patel. 2006. “Distributed Cognition, Representation, and Affordance.” Pragmatics & Cognition 14, no2: 333–41. https://dx.doi.org/10.1075/bct.16.11zha.
Zhang, Jiajie. 1997. “The Nature of External Representations in Problem-Solving.” Cognitive Science 21, no2: 179–217. https://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2102_3.
Copyright (c) 2025 Alper Gülle, Belkıs Uluoğlu
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal which is under a Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
