Research in Architectural Education: Theory and Practice of Visual Training

Main Article Content

Kristin Jones


Today, the significance of vision is often considered from multiple points of view including perceptual, cognitive, imaginative, historical, technical, ethical, cultural, and critical perspectives.  Visual Studies, Visual Communication and Visual Design are popular courses of study found in many programs of higher education. This paper centers on a course called Visual Training within the domain of architectural education.

To illustrate the pedagogical significance of the 78-year old practice, a methodology of Visual Training as it has been conducted at Illinois Institute of Technology is presented.  The paper describes the program of exercises used, and through an interpretation of the course outcomes, it reveals the course structure and pedagogical theory. The discussion shows how Visual Training establishes grounds for architectural critique based on visual perception and aesthetic judgment. In looking at this case of Visual Training, the paper revisits some of the fundamental premises of architectural pedagogy – from methods to ideals – and challenges assumptions about the role of vision in education by calling attention to existing biases shaping many of today’s programs.

Article Details

How to Cite
Jones, K. “Research in Architectural Education: Theory and Practice of Visual Training”. Enquiry The ARCC Journal for Architectural Research, Vol. 13, no. 1, Dec. 2016, doi:10.17831/enq:arcc.v13i2.404.
Peer Reviewed Papers
Author Biography

Kristin Jones, Illinois Institute of Technology


Albers, Josef. 1968. Interview with Josef Albers. Interview by Sevim Fesci. Tape-recorded interview. Archives of American Art. Smithsonian Institution.

Coppola, Francis Ford. 2016. “Coppola and The Art of Coffee.” Wine Spectator, September 30.

Dearstyne, Howard. 1944. “Basic Teaching of Architecture.” Liturgical Arts 12 (May): 56–60.

Domer, Dennis. 1992. “Walter Peterhans and Visual Training at Illinois Institute of Technology.” The Structurist, on Structure and Color in Space, no. 31/32: 44–51.

Fry, Roger. 2011 (Rev. ed). Vision and Design. Mineola, N.Y: Dover Publications.

Hilbert, David. 1970 (in English). “Axiomatic Thinking.” Translated by J. Fang and reprinted in Philosophia Mathematica VII (1–2): 1–12.

Kandinsky, Nina. 1978. Kandinsky et moi. Paris: Flammarion.

Kant, Immanuel, and James Wesley Ellington. 2001. Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics (Second Edition): And the Letter to Marcus Herz, February 1772. Hackett Publishing.

Kepes, Gyorgy. 1965. Education of Vision. New York : G. Braziller. PMCid:PMC495856

Mies van der Rohe, Ludwig. 1965. “Peterhans’ Visual Training Course at the Architectural Department of IIT.” Chicago.

Montessori, Maria. 1964 (Rev. ed.). The Montessori Method. New York: Schocken Books.

National Architectural Accrediting Board, Inc. 2014. “2014 Conditions for Accreditation.”

Peterhans, Walter. 1953. “Peterhans Introduction.” TS. Ulm, Germany. Walter Peterhans Collection. HfG-Archiv Ulm.

Peterhans, Walter. 1955. “Visual Training.” Dimension: University of Michigan Press. PMid:13297335

Peterhans, Walter. 1958. “Outline for Introduction of Visual Training Problems.” TS. Walter Peterhans Collection. IIT Archives.

Peterhans, Walter. 1961. “Fragment on Aesthetics.” Ratio, Basil Blackwell, Vol. III.

Peterhans, Walter. n.d. “On the Nature of Aesthetic Evaluation: General Summary of Problems Proposed for Investigation.” TS. Nachlaß Peterhans: Manuskripte: :Asthetik #1. Museum Folkwang Essen.

Plato. 1974 (Rev. ed.). Plato’s Republic. Indianapolis : Hackett.

Sartwell, Crispin. 2014. “Beauty.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N. Zalta, Spring 2014.